Wednesday 13 July 2016

The Legend of Tarzan (Movie Review)



The purpose of a good trailer is to sell the movie it depicts, and I was partly sold months ago by The Legend of Tarzan's, with its over-the-top action and overall ballsiness. But the main draw for me was the movie's director, David Yates, who is best known for helming the final four Harry Potter films, as well as its upcoming prequel/spinoff, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them.

Here, his directorial skills are used on yet another work of literary fiction, namely Tarzan of the Apes, a book that has been adapted and expanded upon more times than I care to count. And it is clear from the very beginning that he has set out to make his adaptation as far from the 1999 Disney animated film version as possible.

In fact, the movie plays like more of a sequel than an origin story, choosing to fill in the blanks with flashbacks that more often than not break the flow of the story being told. That story is of a Tarzan (Alexander Skarsgård) who has already adjusted to living in the civilized world. He is married to love interest, Jane (Margot Robbie), and has inherited the family estate, as well as taken on the name, John Clayton III.

It isn't long before he is drawn to his home in the African jungle though, after he is convinced by the American emissary, George Washington Williams (Samuel L. Jackson), of a growing slave market in the region. There, he is lured into the trap of villainous Captain Léon Rom (Christoph Waltz), who seeks to deliver Tarzan to the vengeful chief of a local tribe (Djimon Hounsou) in exchange for a truckload of diamonds.

The Legend of Tarzan was plagued by pacing issues, and a script that left more to be desired in terms of character development and backstory. Also, the film's special effects pale in comparison to the impossibly high standard set by the likes of The Jungle Book and the recent Planet of the Apes movies. The result is a film that is far from essential viewing, but is still worth the price of admission.

14 comments:

  1. Shame the special effects don't measure up, although The Jungle Book will be tough to beat.
    It's such a worn tale that someone has to take a really unique angle to make it fresh. Sounds like they tried and failed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't exactly call the movie a complete failure, Alex, just far from brilliant. Perhaps if it came out before the aforementioned films, and was more tightly scripted, I would feel differently. :)

      Delete
  2. Shame that the movie doesn't measure up. Great cast, though, as well as director.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Tony, David Yates did an admirable job with the Harry Potter films. I look forward to seeing how he fares with Fantastic Beasts. :)

      Delete
  3. Hey, know About Phoebe Snetsinger biography? Visit Our page or Secrets Of Phoebe Snetsinger! Do You Know?

    ReplyDelete