Friday, 25 July 2025

The Fantastic Four: First Steps (Movie Review)


Phase Six of the Marvel Cinematic Universe is officially underway, except you'd be forgiven for not even realizing that transition, given how all over the place the prior two phases of its so-called Multiverse Saga have been. But with the promise of two new Avengers movies on the horizon, the time is nigh, nigh I say, for all that chaos to finally coalesce into something meaningful. So does The Fantastic Four: First Steps signal that nexus point, or is the Multiverse Saga well past salvaging?

Set in a parallel universe, the film centers upon the titular Fantastic Four, the primary protectors of Earth-828, whose members include The Thing (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), Human Torch (Joseph Quinn), Invisible Woman (Vanessa Kirby), and Mr. Fantastic himself (Pedro Pascal). It's been four years since they were first exposed to the cosmic radiation that imbued them with their abilities, and they have since grown to attain celebrity status for their heroic deeds. But when the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) arrives on their Earth with news of its impending doom at the hands of Galactus (Ralph Ineson), the First Family will have to find a way to save all of humanity or watch everything and everyone they love get devoured.

As the MCU steamrolls its way towards the next big Avengers team-up, it is clear that the days of an intricately-plotted overarching narrative spanning several movies are well behind us. Nowhere is that more evident than in its latest entry, because of all the movies we've gotten in the franchise recently, The Fantastic Four: First Steps feels like the most self-contained. This itself is not an inherently bad thing, as it allows newcomers to jump in without the fear of needing to do some catching up first, while the rest of us can look forward to how it eventually ties into what came before. 

But when we are this late in the cinematic universe-building game, it feels somewhat odd to be introducing new characters and teams rather than fleshing out existing ones, especially considering all the dangling plot threads that are yet to be addressed. In any case, the First Family aren't exactly newcomers to the comic book movie scene. So after four prior attempts to adapt the Fantastic Four into live-action, I am pleased to say that this latest one is easily the best one yet. I know the bar for quality within the series isn't particularly high, but bear with me here.

The first thing that sets this adaptation apart from the others is its retro-futuristic aesthetic. Matt Shakman proves once again that he can handle period-specific settings like the one he brought to life in WandaVision. I loved the 1960s-inspired look of his film, with the various sets and costumes going a long way to sell that vision. This extends to the visual effects seen throughout the movie, as it makes use of a wide array of practical effects, which further help ground its action scenes in reality. I'd be remiss if I didn't also mention the rousing score by Michael Giacchino. The music in the film slowly grew on me as the movie progressed, twisting and morphing to fit the tone and mood of the onscreen action when needed.

But what I loved about the movie the most was the Fantastic Four themselves. There was definitely a lot of great chemistry between the cast members. I really enjoyed the playful banter between Johnny and Ben, and even though I had some reservations about Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards, especially since we just had John Krasinski in the role, he ultimately won me over with his performance. Each member of the team also gets to showcase their abilities in the movie's various action setpieces, especially Sue, who one might argue was the actual lead. And depending on who you ask, that could either be considered a pro or a con.

Speaking of cons, the biggest one I had walking out of the movie has to do with its connection to the wider MCU. Because aside from a post-credits scene that promises the return of the Fantastic Four in Avengers: Doomsday, the movie doesn't offer much in the way of connective tissue to that film, or its follow-up, Avengers: Secret Wars. Even worse, it doesn't shed light on the end-credits scene from Thunderbolts either, despite both stingers being directed by the directors of those forthcoming Avengers films, the Russo Brothers. 

This tells me that the script for the film was finalized well before the pivot away from Kang's Dynasty, and that these recent post-credits scenes were basically tacked on to their respective movies after the fact, without any real consideration for anything that came before them, and the most tenuous of connections with what is to come next. This is a shame and particularly frustrating for anyone who has been following along with the hope that the scattered events of the last two phases would receive any kind of payoff.

As such, we are still none the wiser about Robert Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom, nor do we know how he is going to fit into the overall narrative. Yes, I realize these questions would most likely get answered during Avengers: Doomsday, but it still feels rather odd to have little in the way of a proper primer, heading into that film. By this same point in Phase Three, we'd already been introduced to Thanos and given a taste of the threat he posed. But right now, there is barely enough to get us excited for Doomsday and Secret Wars, the way we were all excited heading into Avengers: Infinity War, beyond the prospect of seeing RDJ back in the MCU.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is another step in the right direction. But where it stumbles is in its inability or downright unwillingness to pave the way for Avengers: Doomsday. The little tease we got here felt superficial at best and somewhat predictable and ultimately inconsequential at worst. I guess time will tell just how much it is going to factor into the events of that film. Taken as a standalone, though, the movie offers the kind of joyous wonder the superhero genre is known for, and that the MCU definitely needs more of. 

Thursday, 10 July 2025

Superman (Movie Review)


Comic book movies have come a long way since Richard Donner's Superman first wowed moviegoers in 1978. But ask any long-time superhero film fan today, and they would most likely decry the lack of that same wow factor in recent films. Still, if there's one director who has consistently delivered spectacular superhero movies, then it is surely James Gunn, with Guardians of the Galaxy and The Suicide Squad being regarded among the genre's upper echelon. So does his take on Superman breathe new life into the superhero genre, or are we truly within the cold, hard grasp of superhero fatigue?

Shortly after single-handedly stopping an invasion between two warring nations, the titular Superman (David Corenswet) is forced to deal with the consequences of his actions as the US government begins to question his ability to act with impunity. Meanwhile, his archnemesis, Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult), devises a plan to further hurt his reputation, which involves infiltrating his base at the Fortress of Solitude in a bid to gather some dirt. And with his hands already full trying to keep the city of Metropolis safe, Superman would need all the help he can get before he gets grounded for good. 

From the moment it was announced that the DC Extended Universe had come to an unceremonious end, many had wondered what the new vision for its specific pantheon of comic book heroes and villains would look like. After all, we were just coming off several years' worth of movies that made up the DCEU, including the three that comprise what is colloquially known as the Snyderverse. And as a self-proclaimed Zack Snyder fan myself, it was a bit sad to see that director's plans for the DCEU peter out the way they did. I guess his more somber take on the superhero mythos didn't resonate with enough people to make its continued pursuit commercially viable.

So enter James Gunn, with his quirky sensibilities and affinity for needle drops, and the first thing that immediately leaps off the screen in the first film of his newly-minted DC Universe, Superman, are the vibrant colors. Gone are the dull, muted tones of the Snyderverse, replaced instead with a full rainbow's worth of reds, greens, and blues. That vibrancy extends beyond just the color palette, as it also permeates the feel of the movie. There is no other way to say this, but the humor in it is quite goofy, so those looking for something more serious might find the jokes a bit grating.

Thankfully, I was onboard for all of it, especially the meta humor, of which there was plenty, and I had a smile on my face for most of the movie's 130-minute runtime. None of this should come as a surprise to anyone who enjoyed James Gunn's work on the Guardians of the Galaxy films, though, as he once again proves that he can deftly balance between the gags and the heavier subject matters his stories demand. And while the movie does have some political undercurrents like some have feared, it never truly approaches the realm of full-on political commentary and I didn't find it particularly preachy or one-sided. 

As for the new Superman himself, David Corenswet, he definitely gave a performance that channels the charm and overall campiness of those Christopher Reeve Superman films, although I can definitely see how some might take issue with his perceived ineptitude in the film. The other actors also successfully imbue their characters with that same energy, but the true standouts were Edi Gathegi as Mister Terrific and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor; the former's dry humor often had me in stitches while Lex was just gloriously over-the-top. 

The area where Superman truly excels, though, is in its action sequences. Each setpiece in the movie was appropriately grand and wildly kinetic, showcasing the full gamut of superpowers at our heroes' disposal. Not since Zack Snyder's own work on films like 300 and Watchmen have the panels of a comic book been so faithfully brought to life on the big screen, calling to mind the sense of scale and excesses of the Silver Age era of comic books it is clearly drawing inspiration from. I say all that to implore you to watch this film in a theater with a screen big enough to soak it all in.

In terms of how well the movie sets up the new DC Universe, I'd say it does an admirable job. I appreciated the decision to start the story right dab in the middle with a world already populated by metahumans and Superman himself already three years into his tenure as Protector of Metropolis. This negates the need to spend time setting up the universe, and we instead get to learn about the characters as we go. And while some of those characters didn't get nearly enough screen time or character development, I still look forward to seeing them wherever they pop up next. This is doubly so for Krypto, who was the real MVP in my opinion.

Superman is precisely what every comic book movie should aspire to be. It delivers all the thrills and spectacle the genre is known for, but never at the expense of a story filled with hope and smile-inducing moments of tenderness. With this, James Gunn has shown that DC Studios is in more than capable hands and that the DCU is certainly off to a rock-solid start. So my hope going forward is that his movie finds all the success it deserves, to the disappointment of those who would want to see it do otherwise, and that he continues to steer the ship in a worthwhile direction.